کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
3871306 | 1598983 | 2009 | 8 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Intraoperative Thrombus Embolization During Nephrectomy and Tumor Thrombectomy: Critical Analysis of the University of California-Los Angeles Experience Intraoperative Thrombus Embolization During Nephrectomy and Tumor Thrombectomy: Critical Analysis of the University of California-Los Angeles Experience](/preview/png/3871306.png)
PurposeVascular invasion commonly occurs in renal cell carcinoma and intraoperative thrombus embolization is a known complication of tumor thrombectomy. We reviewed our experience with this complication to determine frequency, mortality, common factors and management strategies.Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed a prospective database of cases of open nephrectomy/tumor thrombectomy performed from 1989 to 2008. All cases were reviewed to identify clinicopathological variables, the thrombus extent and intraoperative complications. All cases with events were reviewed to identify preoperative pulmonary embolism, preoperative imaging, thrombus extent, presentation, management and outcome.ResultsA total of 282 cases of venous tumor thrombus were identified. Tumor thrombus level was 0 in 133 cases (47.2%), I to II in 85 (30.1%), III in 27 (9.6%) and IV in 29 (10.3%). Thrombus embolization was identified in 5 patients (1.8%). The incidence in level 0 vs I to IV was 0 of 133 cases (0%) vs 5 of 149 (3.4%), which was statistically significant (p = 0.04). Three patients (60%) died of the event. A review of recent series demonstrated a 1.49% incidence with 75% mortality.ConclusionsIntraoperative thrombus embolization is rare but when it occurs, mortality is extremely high. Strict attention to surgical principles is necessary to decrease risk. Extension into the vena cava, preoperative pulmonary embolism and a bland thrombus component may indicate increased risk. Adjunct procedures, such as preoperative filters and endoluminal occlusive balloons, may be justified in patients at high risk. Even with prompt recognition and embolectomy survival is rare.
Journal: The Journal of Urology - Volume 181, Issue 2, February 2009, Pages 492–499