کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
3899344 1250318 2015 5 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Safety and Efficacy of Quartz Head Contact Laser Ablation for Large Prostates Using 980-nm Laser: A Comparative Prospective Study Against That for Small- and Medium-sized Prostates
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
ایمنی و اثربخشی تماس با لیزر سر تماس کوارتز با پروتزهای بزرگ با استفاده از لیزر 980 نانومتری: مطالعه آینده پژوهی مقایسهای با آن برای پروتئین های کوچک و متوسط
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی بیماری‌های کلیوی
چکیده انگلیسی

ObjectiveTo examine the safety and efficacy of quartz head laser ablation of the prostate (QLAP) in the treatment of large and huge prostates as compared with small- and medium-sized ones.Materials and MethodsTwo hundred forty-two patients with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH) were included in the study, of which 210 patients were evaluable. Patients were divided into 2 groups: group A: patients with BPH volume of <80 mL (120 patients) and group B patients with gland size ≥80 mL. All patients were subjected to QLAP procedure. They were evaluated perioperatively and 1 week; 1, 3, and 6 months; and every 6 months thereafter postoperatively.ResultsPatients' demographics and preoperative data were similar except for the gland size (group A, 54.96 ± 15.49 mL [20-79 mL] and group B, 124.68 ± 40.88 mL [80-233 mL]). Operative time corrected to gland volume was shorter in group B. Only 10% of all patients needed 2 fibers. There was no significant electrolyte change in both groups. Hemoglobin has minimally decreased in both groups but was statistically significant. Group B outcome was significantly better regarding International Prostate Symptom Score, International Prostate Symptom Score quality of life, and uroflowmetry. Prostate size decreased by 47 ± 2% and 62.7 ± 2% at 6 months post operatively for groups A and B, respectively.ConclusionQLAP demonstrated good efficacy and safety in treating large and huge BPH. It possessed no added risk as compared with small prostates. It can be a good alternative to open prostatectomy especially in patients with significant comorbidities.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Urology - Volume 85, Issue 2, February 2015, Pages 452–456
نویسندگان
, , , , ,