Association of Prostate Volume With Voiding Impairment and Deterioration in Quality of Life After Prostate Biopsy

ObjectiveTo evaluate how voiding function and quality of life (QoL) were affected by transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy with respect to prostatic size and to determine whether there is a size-bothersomeness relationship.MethodsNinety-two patients who were candidates for prostate biopsy were included. Ten-core prostate biopsies were taken, and patients were followed up for 7 days. The international prostate symptom score, QoL, maximum urine flow rate (Q-max) and average urine flow rate, postvoid residual urine, and prostate volume (Vp) of the patients were recorded at baseline and on postbiopsy day 7. On receiver operating characteristics curve analysis, a Vp of 38.8 mL was found to be the best cutoff point for deterioration in QoL after biopsy. Then, patients were divided into 2 groups according to baseline Vp, as <38.8 mL and ≥38.8 mL, group 1 and 2, respectively. Baseline and postbiopsy values were compared.ResultsOne patient in group 1 and 5 in group 2 developed acute urinary retention after biopsy, but the difference was not significant (P >.05). Only Vp and Q-max of group 1 (P <.001 and P = .035, respectively), but QoL (P = .002), international prostate symptom score, Q-max, Vp (P <.001 in all 3), and average urine flow rate (P = .006) of group 2 were significantly changed on postbiopsy day 7 compared with baseline.ConclusionPatients with a Vp >38.8 mL were more prone to voiding difficulty and deterioration in QoL after biopsy. They should be informed about the likelihood of these complications.