کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
3902923 1250371 2011 6 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Variation in Use of Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی بیماری‌های کلیوی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Variation in Use of Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer
چکیده انگلیسی

ObjectivesTo better inform avenues for improving the quality of bladder cancer care, we evaluated whether the variation in pelvic lymph node dissection during radical cystectomy was primarily due to the patient or the surgeon. In the clinical guidelines, pelvic lymph node dissection has been recommended as an adjunct to radical cystectomy. However, its use and extent have varied across providers and regions.MethodsUsing the national Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked data for 1992-2005, we identified 4472 patients who had undergone radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Generalized linear multilevel models were fit to assess the relationships between patient and surgeon characteristics and the use and extent (≥10 nodes) of lymphadenectomy. Using a similar modeling framework, we partitioned the variation between the patient and surgeon levels.ResultsOf the 4472 patients who underwent radical cystectomy, 3124 (69.9%) had undergone concurrent lymph node dissection. Of those undergoing lymphadenectomy, only 22% had ≥10 nodes removed. The use of node dissection was primarily determined by the surgeon, which explained 57% of the variation, compared with the patient and disease, which explained only 4.5% of the variability. In contrast, patient level factors explained most of the variation in whether a patient had ≥10 nodes removed.ConclusionsPelvic lymph node dissection is relatively common during radical cystectomy, although nearly 1 in 3 patients do not undergo the procedure. Our results also showed that the physician a patient sees for their bladder cancer matters more than the disease severity in terms of the patient receiving recommended care.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Urology - Volume 77, Issue 2, February 2011, Pages 385–390
نویسندگان
, , , ,