کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
3904254 1250388 2009 5 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Value of Frozen Section Analysis of Enlarged Lymph Nodes During Radical Nephrectomy for Renal Cell Carcinoma
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی بیماری‌های کلیوی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Value of Frozen Section Analysis of Enlarged Lymph Nodes During Radical Nephrectomy for Renal Cell Carcinoma
چکیده انگلیسی

ObjectivesTo avoid unnecessary lymphadenectomy for renal cell cancer (RCC) in patients with retroperitoneal enlarged lymph nodes (ELNs).MethodsFrozen section examination (FSE) of ELNs was used to evaluate the lymphatic status. In the present study, 114 patients with RCC underwent FSE of ELNs and concurrent regional lymphadenectomy. The results of FSE were compared with the final histopathologic results of lymphadenectomy. Some clinical tumor characteristics were also considered to improve the evaluation effect of the FSE. Multiple regression analysis was applied to define the independent risk factors for lymphatic metastasis.ResultsThe final histopathologic results indicated that 36 patients (31.6%) had nodal metastases. In these 36 patients, the FSE of ELNs revealed positive findings in 32 patients and negative findings in 4 patients. The sensitivity, specificity, concordance, and false-negative rate of FSE was 88.9%, 100%, 96.5%, and 11.1%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that distant metastasis and high T stage (T3-T4) were independent risk factors for lymphatic metastasis. When FSE indicated negative results, no nodal metastases were found (64 patients) without these 2 risk factors.ConclusionsELNs in patients with RCC do not necessarily indicate metastatic disease, and more than one half of ELNs were benign. FSE of ELNs can be used to evaluate the lymphatic status. Using the findings from FSE and the clinical characteristics of the primary tumor, we can avoid unnecessary lymphadenectomy in patients with retroperitoneal ELNs.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Urology - Volume 74, Issue 2, August 2009, Pages 364–368
نویسندگان
, , , , ,