Comparing outcomes and costs between contingent and combined first-trimester screening strategies for Down's syndrome

ObjectiveTo compare a contingent strategy with a combined strategy for prenatal detection of Down's syndrome (DS) in terms of cost, outcomes and safety.Study designThe contingent strategy was based on a simulation, removing measurement of the free beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (free βhCG) and calculating the DS risk retrospectively in 32,371 pregnant women who had been screened with the combined strategy in the first trimester. In the contingent strategy, a risk between 1:31 and 1:1000 in the first trimester indicated further testing in the second trimester (alpha-fetoprotein, inhibin A, unconjugated oestriol and free βhCG). The cut-off risk values for the contingent and combined strategies in the first trimester were 1:30 and 1:250, respectively, and the cut-off risk value for integrated screening in the second trimester was 1:250. Costs were compared in terms of avoided DS births, and the ratio of loss of healthy fetuses following invasive procedures per avoided DS birth was calculated.ResultsThe combined strategy had sensitivity of 40/44 (90.9%) and a false-positive rate of 2.8%. Corresponding values for the contingent strategy were 39/44 (88.6%) and 1.3%, respectively. Only 11% of pregnant women required tests in the second trimester, and the approximate cost reduction for each avoided DS birth was 5000€. The ratio of lost healthy fetuses following invasive procedures per avoided DS birth improved by up to 0.65.ConclusionThe contingent strategy has similar effectiveness to the combined strategy, but has lower costs and fewer invasive procedures.