کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
3919770 1599797 2015 6 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Neonatal outcome and delivery mode in labors with repetitive fetal scalp blood sampling
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
نتیجه و روش تحویل نوزادان در آزمایشگاه با نمونه گیری خون دائمی نمونه برداری از پوست جنین
کلمات کلیدی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی زنان، زایمان و بهداشت زنان
چکیده انگلیسی

ObjectiveTo investigate if repeat (≥3) fetal scalp blood sampling (FBS) is associated with increased risk of caesarean delivery and worse neonatal outcome than occasional (1–2) FBS.Study designProspective cohort study of women undergoing intrapartum FBS at Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden. FBS with lactate analysis was performed if the attending doctor found the cardiotocography (CTG) tracing suspicious or abnormal. Lactate concentration was measured bedside. As a routine in all deliveries, acid-base analyses were performed on umbilical artery and vein blood immediately after delivery. Main outcome measures were metabolic acidemia in umbilical artery at delivery, Apgar score <7 at 5 min and caesarean delivery.ResultsDuring the study period there were 2134 FBSs performed on 1070 laboring women with a median of two samplings (range 1–8). There were no differences in Apgar score <7 at 5 min or metabolic acidemia in umbilical artery blood at birth between labors with 1–2 FBS and ≥3 FBS. Among women who underwent 1–2 FBS, 23% had a caesarean delivery as compared with 42% of those having ≥3 FBS. After adjustment for confounders, repeat FBS remained an independent risk factor for caesarean delivery (adj OR 2.05; 95%C.I 1.5–2.8).ConclusionFetal monitoring with repetitive FBS (≥3) during labors with CTG changes is safe for the baby, but the rate of caesarean delivery is doubled as compared to labors where 1–2 FBS are needed. Still, more than 50% of women with repetitive FBS will be delivered vaginally, and 1/3 of these spontaneously.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology - Volume 184, January 2015, Pages 97–102
نویسندگان
, , , ,