Does the method of dissecting in anterior colporraphy lead to a difference in thickness of removed vaginal tissue?

ObjectiveTo evaluate the difference in thickness of the anterior vaginal wall removed after different surgical dissecting techniques of anterior colporrhaphy.Study designIn patients undergoing primary anterior colporrhaphy, trimmed vaginal tissue was taken following different surgical techniques of vaginal wall dissection. Tissues were preserved in formalin and stained with hematoxylin-eosin and elastica-van Giesen stains. The examiner was an experienced pathologist blinded to the surgical technique. The specimens were examined for the epithelial thickness (ET), lamina propria thickness (LPT), muscular layer thickness (MT) and total thickness (TT).ResultsTissue was analysed in 93 women who underwent anterior compartment pelvic organ prolapse surgery. There was no difference between the different surgical techniques in thickness measured in the three histological layers and for the total thickness. The use of hydrodissection was the only independent factor leading to thicker removed vaginal tissue.ConclusionsDissecting the vaginal wall as thin as possible does not result in a thinner vaginal layer than dissecting in the most optimal surgical plane. The use of hydrodissection provides a thicker trimmed tissue.