Modified prepubic TVT-obturator tape procedure versus the conventional method: a preliminary study

ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety of the modified prepubic tension-free vaginal tape-obturator (PTVT-O) system procedure with the original TVT-O methods.Study designOne hundred and ninety women with urodynamic stress incontinence (USI) were included in this study (93 cases in the TVT-O group and 97 in the PTVT-O group). Clinical assessments before and one year after surgery included urinalyses, 1-h pad tests, urodynamic studies, and a personal interview with the overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS) questionnaire.ResultsThere were no differences between the two groups in mean age, parity, menopausal status, mean operative time and subjective cure rates (P > 0.05), but the efficacy of surgery (cure and improvement) in the PTVT-O group was significantly higher than that in the TVT-O group (P = 0.038). Complication rates and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were found to be similar (P > 0.05). OABSS decreased significantly after surgery in both groups (P < 0.05) although all urodynamic parameters revealed no significant difference after both procedures (P > 0.05).ConclusionOur modified procedure is a safe and effective treatment for female USI. It has an advantage over the original TVT-O with better surgical efficacy and comparable postoperative pain, although the follow-up times in this study are different.