Women with asymptomatic cervical polyps may not need to see a gynaecologist or have them removed: an observational retrospective study of 1126 cases

Objectives(1) To determine the prevalence of pathology in cervical polyps and whether referring and/or removing them is justified, (2) to assess the frequency of associated endometrial pathology and whether investigating the uterine cavity is warranted, and (3) to estimate the financial costs of processing cervical polyps.Study designRetrospective review of the histopathology database and case notes of women who had cervical polyps examined at the pathology department of Ipswich Hospital, UK, over a seven-year period from 01/01/2002 to 31/12/2008.ResultsThe number of cervical polyps removed from 988 women was 1126. Each case of polyps was considered as a separate episode. The recurrence rate was 15%. All polyps were benign except two (0.2%) symptomatic polyps that showed high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. The cost of referring women with cervical polyps (excluding women aged >45 years with abnormal bleeding and those with abnormal smear) to see a gynaecologist and of examining polyps histologically was estimated to be £94 816.40. Further investigations to assess the cervix and/or uterine cavity which were performed for 133 women (14.3%), because of the cervical polyps and for no other clinical indication, showed no significant pathology at cost of £41 195.54.ConclusionOur data do not justify referring women with asymptomatic cervical polyps to see a gynaecologist. Further, removing these polyps and investigating the uterine cavity is not warranted. A policy of removing polyps from only symptomatic women or those with abnormal smear and limiting histological examination to these polyps would result in significant savings.