کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
3939567 1253562 2011 6 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
A prospective randomized noninferiority study comparing recombinant FSH and highly purified menotropin in intrauterine insemination cycles in couples with unexplained infertility and/or mild-moderate male factor
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی زنان، زایمان و بهداشت زنان
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
A prospective randomized noninferiority study comparing recombinant FSH and highly purified menotropin in intrauterine insemination cycles in couples with unexplained infertility and/or mild-moderate male factor
چکیده انگلیسی

ObjectiveTo demonstrate the noninferiority of highly purified menotropin (HP-hMG) compared with recombinant FSH (rFSH) regarding clinical pregnancy rate (PR) in intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles.DesignProspective randomized noninferiority trial.SettingUnit of physiopathology of human reproduction, university hospital.Patient(s)Five hundred twenty-three patients with unexplained infertility or mild male infertility undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IUI.Intervention(s)Patients were randomized for treatment with rFSH (262 patients) or HP-hMG (261 patients). Insemination was performed 34–36 hours after hCG injection.Main Outcome Measure(s)The primary outcome was clinical pregnancy rate (PR). The secondary outcome was the number of interrupted cycles for high risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and multiple pregnancy.Result(s)The clinical PR was 19.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 15.3%–25.1%) in the HP-hMG group and 21.4% (95% CI 16.9%–26.8%) in the rFSH group [absolute difference −1.7% (95% CI −8.6%–5.2%)]; therefore, the noninferiority was demonstrated. The number of interrupted cycles for OHSS risk and multiple pregnancy was significanty higher in the rFSH group, 8.4% (95% CI 5.6%–12.4%) than in the HP-hMG group 1.2% (95% CI 0.4%–3.3%) [absolute difference −7.27% (95% CI −11.3 to −3.7)].Conclusion(s)HP-hMG is not inferior compared with rFSH regarding clinical PR.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Fertility and Sterility - Volume 95, Issue 2, February 2011, Pages 689–694
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , , , ,