کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
3945890 | 1254303 | 2009 | 5 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Dissection of soft-preserved cadavers in the training of gynaecological oncologists: Report of the first UK workshop Dissection of soft-preserved cadavers in the training of gynaecological oncologists: Report of the first UK workshop](/preview/png/3945890.png)
ObjectiveTo assess the surgical anatomy knowledge of gynaecological oncology (GO) trainees and to evaluate the impact of a cadaveric dissection course on postgraduate surgical training.MethodsAn intensive 3-day cadaveric dissection course with illustrated lectures and supervised dissection, with a multiple-choice questionnaire (MCQ) on surgical anatomy at the beginning and end of the course was organised in the Anatomy Facility of a London Medical School. Each cadaver was embalmed with a mixture of alcohol, phenol and glycerol (“soft-preserved”) rather than fixed in formalin, to more closely preserve in vivo conditions of the body. There were ten dissecting delegates, two per cadaver. The delegates dissected the abdomen and pelvis with the emphasis on surgical approaches rather than the classical descriptive anatomy approaches. Delegates also completed a course evaluation.ResultsWithout negative marking, the mean initial MCQ score was 57%, and final mean score 64%. With negative marking, the mean initial score was 43%, and mean final score 53%. Delegates rated the course highly, would recommend it to other trainees and considered that such a course should be incorporated into subspecialty training.ConclusionThe surgical anatomy knowledge of subspecialty trainees was weak but improved as a result of the dissection course. The most positive finding was the course evaluation. Postgraduate surgical training in GO would likely be enhanced by, and arguably requires, cadaveric dissection. “Soft-preserved” rather than formalin-fixed cadavers should be used.
Journal: Gynecologic Oncology - Volume 113, Issue 3, June 2009, Pages 352–356