The efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in different histological types of cervical cancer

• This is the first meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of NACT between two different histological types of cervical carcinoma.
• The short-term outcomes were similar between SCC and non-SCC.
• Histological type may be used to predict the long-term efficacy of NACT, especially those with FIGO stages above IIB.

ObjectiveTo determine whether the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is different among cervical cancer types, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and non-SCC, including adenocarcinoma of the cervix (ACC) and adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC).MethodsWe searched PubMed, MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Springerlink and CNKI for studies published between Jan 1987 and Sep 2012 and evaluated the studies published in English and Chinese on NACT and cervical carcinoma based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Because there was a relative lack of relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs), we included 2 RCTs and 9 observational studies in our analysis. Meta-analysis was applied to calculate the efficacy of NACT in different histological types of cervical cancer with 95% confidence intervals. The risk of bias was assessed by Begg's adjusted rank correlation test and Egger's regression asymmetry tests.ResultsAs many as 11 articles, 2 RCTs and 9 observational studies, were selected according to the eligibility criteria for a total of 1559 participants. For the short-term efficacy of NACT, either in terms of CR + PR or CR only, there was no difference between SCC and non-SCC when the data were pooled (P > 0.05) in stratified studies based on the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage (P > 0.05) or histological type (P > 0.05) or in observational studies (P > 0.05). Nevertheless, SCC was associated with a higher short-term response rate than non-SCC in RCTs [6.57 (95%CI 1.72–25.12) in CR + PR]. For the long-term outcome of NACT, patients with SCC experienced a significant 5-year overall survival (OS) and progress-free survival (PFS) when compared to patients with non-SCC in pooled [1.47 (95%CI 1.06–2.06)] and observational studies [1.96 (95%CI 1.61–2.38)] other than RCTs (P > 0.05). Moreover, this difference was especially obvious when the subgroup analysis was restricted to patients in stages above IIB [2.06 (95%CI 1.79–2.36)] rather than in stages IB–IIB [1.33 (95%CI 0.99–1.79)].ConclusionAlthough no significant differences exist in the short-term efficacy of NACT, the histological type may be used to predict the long-term efficacy of NACT in patients with cervical cancer, especially those with FIGO stages above IIB.