کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
3952510 1600394 2009 4 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
A comparison of the accuracy of the corpuscular fragility and mean corpuscular volume tests for the alpha-thalassemia 1 and beta-thalassemia traits
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی زنان، زایمان و بهداشت زنان
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
A comparison of the accuracy of the corpuscular fragility and mean corpuscular volume tests for the alpha-thalassemia 1 and beta-thalassemia traits
چکیده انگلیسی

ObjectiveTo compare the accuracy of the osmotic fragility test (OFT) and mean corpuscular volume (MCV) calculation when screening for the α-thalassemia 1 and/or β-thalassemia trait.MethodIn this cross-sectional study, blood samples from 328 apparently healthy pregnant women were sent on the same day to separate laboratories for the OFT (performed using a glycerol 0.45%, phosphate-buffered, sodium chloride solution) and MCV testing (by means of a standard automated hematology analyzer). A polymerase chain reaction was also performed to positively diagnose α-thalassemia 1 carriers, and a quantitative HbA2 test to positively diagnose β-thalassemia carriers.ResultsSensitivity and specificity were 95.0% and 86% for the OFT; and based on the cut-off point of 78.1 fL derived from the ROC curve, they were 93% and 93.4% for MCV calculation. The latter test was found to be slightly more accurate than the OFT in predicting the presence of the α-thalassemia 1 and/or β-thalassemia trait.ConclusionBoth tests have high screening sensitivity for the α-thalassemia 1 and/or β-thalassemia traits, and their simplicity and very low cost make them attractive as screening tests for large populations. Since MCV seems to provide fewer false-positive results, it may be the first choice wherever an automated hematology analyzer calculating MCV is available.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics - Volume 107, Issue 1, October 2009, Pages 26–29
نویسندگان
, , , , ,