Infracoccygeal sacropexy or sacrospinous suspension for uterine or vaginal vault prolapse

Objective:To compare infracoccygeal sacropexy (IS) and sacrospinous suspension (SS) for the treatment of uterine or vault prolapse.Methods:A randomized trial of 49 women assigned to either the IS group using IVS tape (n = 24) or SS group (n = 25). Concomitant hysterectomy and repairs were performed as appropriate. Evaluations included prolapse staging using the POP-Q system and validated questionnaires for symptoms (PFDI), quality of life (PFIQ), and sexuality (PISQ-12). The primary outcome measure was postoperative pain.Results:Patients' characteristics were similar in both groups. IS was quicker, easier, and less painful than SS (P < 0.01). Hemorrhage or hematoma rates were similar. Neither rectal injury nor vaginal erosion occurred. Mean follow-up was 16.8 months. Prolapse cure rates, symptom scores, and quality of life were similar. Postoperative cystocele occurred in 4.8% of women after IS and 25% after SS (P > 0.05).Conclusion:Infracoccygeal sacropexy is equivalent to sacrospinous suspension, with a decreased rate of postoperative pain and cystocele recurrence.