Comparison of quality-of-life changes in patients with stress urinary incontinence after midurethral sling placement

ObjectiveTo compare changes in quality of life for women undergoing either suprapubic or transvaginal midurethral sling placement for stress urinary incontinence (SUI).MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 113 patients who underwent transvaginal or suprapubic midurethral sling placement for SUI over 2 years at a US institution. All patients completed a short form of the urogenital distress inventory (UDI-6) questionnaire preoperatively and postoperatively. Preoperative and postoperative UDI-6 scores were compared between the 2 groups. Data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test and the Fisher exact test.ResultsA midurethral sling was placed using the suprapubic approach in 70 patients, and 43 patients underwent the procedure using the transvaginal approach. Preoperatively, there was no statistical difference between mean UDI-6 scores for the suprapubic versus the transvaginal group (48.5 versus 51.0 P = 0.9). Postoperatively, patients who underwent a suprapubic procedure had significantly lower mean UDI-6 scores than those who underwent a transvaginal procedure (10.6 versus 17.0; P < 0.005).ConclusionSuprapubic midurethral sling placement was associated with a significantly greater quality of life postoperatively compared with the transvaginal procedure.