Long-Term Follow-Up After Laparoscopic Management of Endometrial Cancer in the Obese: A Fifteen-Year Cohort Study

Study ObjectiveTo assess the surgical outcomes and long-term results of laparoscopic treatment of endometrial cancer in obese patients, and compare these results with those of nonobese women.DesignRetrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).SettingTwo referral cancer centers.PatientsFifty-two obese and 155 nonobese women with clinical stage I endometrial cancer managed by laparoscopy from 1990–2005 in two referral centers.InterventionsDemographic, surgical, perioperative and pathological characteristics of obese women and nonobese women with endometrial cancer treated by laparoscopy were analyzed and then compared. Recurrence-free and overall survival was calculated by use of Kaplan-Meier method.Measurements and Main ResultsMedian BMI of the study population was 26.2 Kg/m2. Median BMI among obese patients was 34.2 Kg/m2. The conversion rate was independent from the BMI of the patient (3.8% vs 4.5%, p = .80). Neither mean operative time (187.5 vs 172 min, p = .11) neither hospital stay (5.2 vs 4.9 days, p = .44) were related with BMI. Lymphadenectomy was considered not feasible in 7 obese (17%) and 8 nonobese (7%) women (p = 0.09). Fewer lymph nodes were retrieved among obese women (8 versus 11, p <.0002). No differences were found between the groups in terms of perioperative complications. Median follow-up was 69 and 71 months for the obese and nonobese, respectively (p = .59). Overall and disease-free 5-year survival rates did not differ between obese and nonobese patients (90.3% and 87.5% versus 88.5% and 89.8%, respectively).ConclusionDespite some limitations, the laparoscopic approach seems to be particularly useful for obese patients with endometrial cancer, with similar survival and recurrence rates and without any more complications compared to the nonobese population.