کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
4034196 1263435 2011 13 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Disparity biasing in depth from monocular occlusions
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علم عصب شناسی سیستم های حسی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Disparity biasing in depth from monocular occlusions
چکیده انگلیسی

Monocular occlusions have been shown to play an important role in stereopsis. Among other contributions to binocular depth perception, monocular occlusions can create percepts of illusory occluding surfaces. It has been argued that the precise location in depth of these illusory occluders is based on the constraints imposed by occlusion geometry. Tsirlin et al. (2010) proposed that when these constraints are weak, the depth of the illusory occluder can be biased by a neighboring disparity-defined feature. In the present work we test this hypothesis using a variety of stimuli. We show that when monocular occlusions provide only partial constraints on the magnitude of depth of the illusory occluders, the perceived depth of the occluders can be biased by disparity-defined features in the direction unrestricted by the occlusion geometry. Using this disparity bias phenomenon we also show that in illusory occluder stimuli where disparity information is present, but weak, most observers rely on disparity while some use occlusion information instead to specify the depth of the illusory occluder. Taken together our experiments demonstrate that in binocular depth perception disparity and monocular occlusion cues interact in complex ways to resolve perceptual ambiguity.


► We examined the effect of disparity on perceived depth from monocular occlusions.
► We used stimuli where illusory surfaces were induced by monocular occlusions.
► Disparity-induced bias in perceived depth was found in several different stimuli.
► The disparity bias was restricted by occlusion geometry.
► Monocular occlusions were used instead of disparity when disparity signal was weak.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Vision Research - Volume 51, Issue 14, 15 July 2011, Pages 1699–1711
نویسندگان
, , ,