Do characteristics of a stationary obstacle lead to adjustments in obstacle stepping strategies?

• Participants stepped over an obstacle with/without a ground reference object below.
• No change in clearance, take-off or landing distance with presence of reference object below.
• Responses scaled to obstacle top edge: Greater tripping hazard than ground reference object.

Navigating cluttered and complex environments increases the risk of falling. To decrease this risk, it is important to understand the influence of obstacle visual cues on stepping parameters, however the specific obstacle characteristics that have the greatest influence on avoidance strategies is still under debate. The purpose of the current work is to provide further insight on the relationship between obstacle appearance in the environment and modulation of stepping parameters. Healthy young adults (N = 8) first stepped over an obstacle with one visible top edge (“floating”; 8 trials) followed by trials where experimenters randomly altered the location of a ground reference object to one of 7 different positions (8 trials per location), which ranged from 6 cm in front of, directly under, or up to 6 cm behind the floating obstacle (at 2 cm intervals). Mean take-off and landing distance as well as minimum foot clearance values were unchanged across different positions of the ground reference object; a consistent stepping trajectory was observed for all experimental conditions. Contrary to our hypotheses, results of this study indicate that ground based visual cues are not essential for the planning of stepping and clearance strategies. The simultaneous presentation of both floating and ground based objects may have provided critical information that lead to the adoption of a consistent strategy for clearing the top edge of the obstacle. The invariant foot placement observed here may be an appropriate stepping strategy for young adults, however this may not be the case across the lifespan or in special populations.