کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
4082050 1267621 2012 7 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Anterior knee laxity measurement: Comparison of passive stress radiographs Telos® and “Lerat”, and GNRB® arthrometer
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی ارتوپدی، پزشکی ورزشی و توانبخشی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Anterior knee laxity measurement: Comparison of passive stress radiographs Telos® and “Lerat”, and GNRB® arthrometer
چکیده انگلیسی

SummaryIntroductionIn patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears, anterior laxity can be measured using stress radiographs or more recently introduced electronic measurement devices.HypothesisThe GNRB® arthrometer offers a radiation-free method of measuring anterior knee laxity whose diagnostic value is identical to that of Telos® or Lerat stress radiographs.Patients and methodsOne hundred and fifty-seven patients (40 years [18–69]) scheduled for knee arthroscopy were evaluated using the GNRB® and two series of stress radiographs of both knees, one obtained using a 250-N Telos® device and the other using the technique described by Lerat (posterior translation of the femur/tibia under a 9-kg loading device). Arthroscopic evaluation of the ACL served as the reference standard for assessing the diagnostic performance of the radiological and instrumental laxity measurements.ResultsUnder arthroscopic examination, the ACL was normal in 50.3%; “healed to roof of the notch” (partial tear) in 9.6%, “posterolateral bundle preserved” (partial tear) in 7.0%, “healed to the posterior cruciate ligament” (PCL) in 17.8%, and “empty notch” (complete tear) in 15.3%. In partial ACL tears, no significant differences in anterior laxity were found across the three measurement techniques. Telos® and GNRB® laxities were greater in the complete-tear group than in the normal-ACL, partial-tear, and healed-to-PCL groups. With the Lerat technique, the only significant differences were between the complete-tear group and the normal-ACL and partial-tear groups. Telos® and GNRB® showed similar diagnostic performance (sensitivity > 62%, specificity > 75%), whereas the Lerat technique lacked sensitivity (sensitivity = 43.2%, specificity = 82.7%) at 3 mm.DiscussionDiagnostic performance was lower in our study than in earlier reports. The GNRB® performed as well as Telos®. The non-irradiating nature of GNRB® assessments allows repeated measurements for therapeutic or diagnostic purposes.Level of evidenceLevel III, prospective case-control study.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research - Volume 98, Issue 7, November 2012, Pages 744–750
نویسندگان
, , , , , , ,