کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
4112603 1606020 2013 6 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Primary dilatation as a treatment for pediatric laryngotracheal stenosis: A systematic review
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی بیماری های گوش و جراحی پلاستیک صورت
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Primary dilatation as a treatment for pediatric laryngotracheal stenosis: A systematic review
چکیده انگلیسی

ObjectiveTo identify and review original studies on balloon and rigid dilatation as primary therapy for laryngotracheal stenosis (LTS) in pediatric patients.DesignSystematic review.MethodsA comprehensive search strategy in MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted and limited to human studies published in English after 1980. Two independent reviewers identified original studies on primary dilatation therapy for LTS in patients younger than 18 years. Studies on tracheobronchial stenosis or stents for tracheomalacia were excluded. 22 of 369 identified studies (6%) met the inclusion criteria. Two reviewers independently appraised the level of evidence of each study, using the Oxford clinical evidence-based medicine guidelines, and extracted raw data using a standardized form developed a priori.ResultsThe patient population consisted of grades I–III LTS. Most studies used adjuvant therapy including laser or topical agents. The primary outcome of success was achieving a functional airway without open laryngo-tracheal surgery or ongoing need for a tracheostomy. In studies using balloon dilatation alone (6 studies, n = 10) or rigid dilatation alone (5 studies, n = 68), success rates were 50% and 53%, respectively. Success rates ranged from 50% to 78% for balloon dilatation with adjuvant therapy (6 studies, n = 24) and 53%–100% for rigid dilatation with adjuvant therapy (5 studies, n = 61).ConclusionsDilatation was successful as primary therapy in the majority of low-grade pediatric LTS. Given the lack of comparative studies among other study limitations, it could not be determined whether one method of dilatation was superior to another.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology - Volume 77, Issue 5, May 2013, Pages 623–628
نویسندگان
, ,