Quantitation of T lymphocytes in posttransplant transbronchial biopsies

SummaryThe diagnostic role of immunohistochemical staining for T lymphocytes in grading acute airway rejection has not been fully explored. We examined 136 transbronchial biopsies from 52 lung transplant patients and 9 nontransplant controls. Transplant rejection was based on histologic assessment of perivascular (A) and bronchiolar (B) infiltrates. The clinical indication for the 136 allograft biopsies was routine surveillance (n = 72), decreased pulmonary function, rule out rejection (n = 36), suspect infection (n = 16), rule out obliterative bronchiolitis (n = 6), and persistent postoperative graft failure (n = 6). T lymphocytes were counted in bronchial mucosa per 100 bronchial epithelial cells, and in alveolar walls per square millimeters, after immunohistochemical staining with anti-CD3, CD4, and CD8. In controls, the mean alveolar wall CD3 cell count was 45 per square millimeter (95% confidence intervals, 30-52 per square millimeter) and the mean CD8 count was 15 per square millimeter (2-20 per square millimeter). In surveillance and negative patient biopsies, alveolar wall CD8 counts were significantly greater than controls (P = .03 and .02, respectively). Mean alveolar wall CD3 counts were significantly higher in type A rejection (88.7 ± 12.9) than controls and negative biopsies (42 ± 5.3, P < .001), but there was no difference compared to infections (119.7 ± 22, P > .5). Mucosal CD3 cell counts were significantly higher in type B rejection (16.1 ± 2.5) than controls and negative biopsies (1.5 ± 0.4, P < .001), and also higher than infections (3.9 ± 1.1, P < .001). In 7% of biopsies, T-cell staining identified perivascular circumferential infiltrates that were difficult to identify on routine stains, and in an additional 9% minor changes in grading were made after reviewing T-cell markers. Immunohistochemical staining may help in identifying perivascular infiltrates and demonstrates increased intraepithelial T-cells even in low-grade type B rejection. Type B rejection as assessed quantitatively is more specific than type A rejection in comparison to infection.