Can congenital pulmonary airway malformation be distinguished from Type I pleuropulmonary blastoma based on clinical and radiological features?

BackgroundThe management of congenital cystic lung lesions is controversial. Arguments for routine resection during infancy include the possibility of the lesion being Type I pleuropulmonary blastoma (PPB) rather than a cystic congenital pulmonary airway malformation (CPAM). We aimed to identify clinical and radiological features that might distinguish between CPAM and PPB and to develop a diagnostic algorithm based on these features.MethodsAll recorded cases of Type I PPB were retrieved from the International PPB Registry and compared with an institutional cohort of children undergoing resection of CPAM (2002–2013) that was noted at some stage to be at least partially cystic. Regression models were created to identify variables that might differentiate CPAM from PPB. Odds ratio (OR) and positive predictive value (PPV) were calculated for each variable and a decision algorithm developed.ResultsIn 112 cases of Type I PPB and 103 of CPAM, factors favoring a diagnosis of CPAM included prenatal detection (OR 89.4), systemic feeding vessel (OR 61.7), asymptomatic (OR 8.0), and hyperinflated lung (OR 6.6). Factors favoring a diagnosis of PPB included bilateral or multisegment involvement (OR 2.4). A decision algorithm that helps to identify lesions requiring resection and those which can be safely observed is presented.ConclusionClinical and radiological features can help to differentiate between CPAM and PPB. Our algorithm allows identification of children at higher risk of PPB in whom we would recommend resection and those at low risk in whom continued close observation is safe.