Risk factors and management of Nuss bar infections in 1717 patients over 25 years

PurposeAn increase in postoperative infections after Nuss procedures led us to seek risks and review management. We report potential risk factors and make inferences for prevention of infections.MethodsAn IRB-approved retrospective chart review was used to evaluate demographic, clinical, surgical, and postoperative variables of patients operated on between 10/1/2005 and 6/30/2013. Those with postoperative infection were evaluated for infection characteristics, management, and outcomes with univariate analyses.ResultsOver this 8-year period (2005–2013), 3.5% (30) of 854 patients developed cellulitis or infection, significantly more than 1.5% (13) in our previous report of 863 patients, 1987–2005 (p = .007). The most frequent organism cultured was methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus. Patients who were given clindamycin preoperatively (5 of 26 patients) had higher infection rates than those who received cefazolin (25 of 828) (19% vs 3%, p < .001). Patients treated with a peri-incisional ON-Q (I-Flow, Kimberly-Clark, Irvine, CA) also had higher infection rates (8.3% vs 2.4%, p < .001). Of the 30 patients who developed an infection, eighteen (60%) with cellulitis or superficial infections did not require surgical treatment or early bar removal. The other twelve patients (40%) with deep hardware infections required an average of 2.2 operations (range 1–6), with 3 (25%) requiring removal of their stabilizer and 3 (25%) requiring early bar removal. None of these three patients experienced recurrence of pectus excavatum at 2 to 4 years of follow-up.ConclusionPreoperative antibiotic selection and use of ON-Q's may influence infection rates after Nuss repair. Nuss bars could be preserved in 90% of all patients with an infection and even 75% of those with a deep hardware infection. Attempts to retain the bar when an infection occurs may help prevent pectus excavatum recurrence.Level of Evidence = III.