Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in children is associated with decreased cost and length of stay: Results of a two-center analysis

PurposeOur aim was to compare outcomes of children undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LC+CBDE) to those undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with adjunctive endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (LC+ERCP).MethodsWe performed a two-center retrospective chart review of all children (< 18 years) undergoing LC+CBDE or LC+ERCP between January 2000 and July 2011. Wilcoxon test was performed on continuous variables and logistic regression modeling on categorical data. A P value < 0.05 was considered significant. Outcomes with a P value < 0.2 were selected for multivariable analysis.ResultsForty-two patients were identified. Twenty-four (57%) underwent LC+ERCP, and eighteen (43%) underwent LC+CBDE. Demographic and clinical factors were well matched between groups. Total operative time was similar between groups (157 min vs. 152 min, P = .26). LC+CBDE patients had zero major complications and five minor complications (retained stone: 3, pancreatitis: 1, late recurrence: 1). LC+ERCP patients experienced two major complications (duodenal perforation: 1, bleeding requiring transfusion: 1), and four minor complications (pancreatitis: 2, retained stone: 2, P = .57). Median length of stay was significantly longer (15.7 days vs. 6.6 days, P = .02), and median hospital cost was significantly higher ($18,132 vs. $12,735, P < .01) in the LC+ERCP group. Multivariable analysis revealed that cost was significantly lower in patients undergoing LC+CBDE (P = .05, OR = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.51–0.97).ConclusionLC+CBDE at the time of cholecystectomy is associated with decreased length of stay, decreased cost, and has similar or improved morbidity compared to LC+ERCP.