Preclinical regulatory validation of an engineered diaphragmatic tendon made with amniotic mesenchymal stem cells

PurposeUnder a Food and Drug Administration directive, we examined definite long-term safety and efficacy aspects of an engineered diaphragmatic tendon graft as a regulatory prerequisite for clinical trials.MethodsNewborn lambs (N = 27) underwent partial diaphragmatic replacement with a Teflon patch, a composite acellular bioprosthesis, or the same bioprosthesis seeded with autologous amniotic mesenchymal stem cells processed under Good Manufacturing Practice guidelines. Multiple safety and efficacy analyses were performed at different time points up to 14 months of age (ovine adulthood).ResultsThere was no mortality. None of the blood tests or full body autopsy specimens showed any abnormality. There was a significantly higher failure rate in animals that received an acellular bioprosthetic graft vs an engineered graft, with no significant differences between Teflon and acellular bioprosthetic implants. Tensile strength and total collagen levels were significantly higher in engineered grafts than in acellular bioprosthetic grafts. On histology, lysozyme and myeloperoxidase stainings were unremarkable in all grafts.ConclusionsDiaphragmatic repair with a clinically viable autologous tendon engineered with amniotic mesenchymal stem cells leads to improved outcomes when compared with an equivalent acellular bioprosthesis, with no local or systemic adverse effects. Clinical trials of engineered diaphragmatic repair appear practicable within regulatory guidelines.