کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
4195454 1608922 2016 4 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Creation of the ideal gastric tube: Comparison of three methods: A prospective cohort study
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
ایجاد لوله ایده آل معده: مقایسه سه روش: یک مطالعه کوهورت آینده نگر
کلمات کلیدی
لوله معده؛ صیقل دهنده جراحی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی سیاست های بهداشت و سلامت عمومی
چکیده انگلیسی


• We herein compare three methods of gastric tube creation.
• Using radial type staplers, we can create a durable gastric tube.
• We also reduce the number of staplers and therefore reduce operative cost.

IntroductionVarious types of staplers are used for gastric tube formation after esophagectomy. Using a stapling device, a gastric tube can safely be created in a short amount of time. The problems with gastric tube creation using only linear type staplers include staple overlap as well as the problem of cost associated with using multiple staplers. To address this, both linear and radial type staplers have been introduced. We herein compare three methods of gastric tube creation.MethodsFrom 2012 to 2014, 62 patients with esophageal cancer underwent esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction. We evaluated and compared the mean number of stapler loads and cost in each groups.ResultsThe mean number of stapler loads was 6.24 in method A, 5.16 in method B, and 4.33 in method C. The mean cost accounting for total staple fires per case was 3116.07 dollars in the method A group, 2576.74 dollars in the method B group, and 2447.78 dollars in the method C group. Anastomotic leaks developed in 4 cases in the method A group and in 3 cases in the method B group. There were no anastomotic leaks in the method C group.ConclusionWe hypothesize that by using radial type staplers, we can create a durable gastric tube and reduce the number of staplers and therefore reduce operative cost.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Annals of Medicine and Surgery - Volume 6, March 2016, Pages 42–45
نویسندگان
, , ,