کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
4199150 | 1279097 | 2006 | 17 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
Despite the expanding literature on the importance role public policy plays in influencing the broader determinants of the public's health, profound differences exist among jurisdictions in the attention placed by the State – as represented by public health authorities and agencies – upon such activities. In this paper we examine the dominant public health models of Canada, USA, UK, and Sweden. The Canadian and USA public health communities are focused upon individualized approaches to risk management. In contrast, the UK and Swedish public health scenes are more oriented toward broader approaches to health determinants. We argue that the extent to which governments, public health agencies and public health workers concern themselves with public policy approaches to address broader determinants of health depends upon the particular model of health adhered to within each jurisdiction. And whether a health model is adopted depends upon the ideological and political context within which a nation is situated. Canada represents a situation where concerted effort to influence governmental policy directions by the public health community could reap significant benefits.
Journal: Health Policy - Volume 78, Issue 1, 22 August 2006, Pages 39–55