کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
4352953 | 1298163 | 2009 | 10 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Membrane potential response profiles of CA1 pyramidal cells probed with voltage-sensitive dye optical imaging in rat hippocampal slices reveal the impact of GABAA-mediated feed-forward inhibition in signal propagation Membrane potential response profiles of CA1 pyramidal cells probed with voltage-sensitive dye optical imaging in rat hippocampal slices reveal the impact of GABAA-mediated feed-forward inhibition in signal propagation](/preview/png/4352953.png)
The spatial and temporal distribution of excitatory and inhibitory membrane potential responses on a cell plays an important role in neuronal calculations in local neuronal circuits in the brain. The electrical dynamics of excitatory and inhibitory inputs along the somatodendritic extent of CA1 pyramidal cells during circuit activation were examined by stimulating strata radiatum (SR), oriens (SO), and lacunosum-moleculare (SLM) and measuring laminar responses with voltage-sensitive dye (VSD) optical recording methods. We first confirmed the linearity of the optical signal by comparing fluorescence changes in CA1 to global membrane potential changes when slices were bathed in high-potassium ([K+]O = 25 mM) solution. Except for a TTX-sensitive component in stratum pyramidale, fluorescence changes were equal in all strata, indicating that VSD sensitivity had reasonable linearity across layers. We then compared membrane potential profiles in slices exposed to picrotoxin, a GABAA receptor antagonist. We attributed the picrotoxin-induced changes in the first peak of the excitatory membrane potential to feed-forward inhibition and the later response (appearing 30 ms after stimulation) to feedback inhibition. A difference in feed-forward components was observed in perisomatic and distal apical dendritic regions after SR stimulation. SLM stimulation produced large differences in perisomatic and apical dendritic regions. SO stimulation, however, produced no feed-forward inhibition at the perisomatic region, but produces feed-forward inhibition in distal dendritic regions. These results suggest that actual inhibition of membrane potential response by feed-forward inhibition is greater at perisomatic regions after SR or SLM stimulation but is smaller at distal dendritic regions after SR, SO, and SLM stimulation.
Journal: Neuroscience Research - Volume 64, Issue 2, June 2009, Pages 152–161