Restoration of former agricultural fields on acid sandy soils: Conversion to heathland, rangeland or forest?

• three restoration strategies for agricultural fields evaluated after 18 and 25 years.
• heathland restoration hampered by high P-availability, even after topsoil removal.
• conversion to rangeland led to low N-availability and relatively high plant-diversity.
• new forests can make use of excess nutrients, but undergrowth remained eutrophic.
• rangeland conversion and afforestation create open landscape with free-living herds.

Three restoration strategies on agricultural fields with acid sandy soil were evaluated after 18 and 25 years: conversion to heathland, rangeland and forest. Changes in soil microstructure, chemical characteristics, availability of N and P, and vegetation composition were analyzed in agricultural soils, three undisturbed reference sites and five types of restored former agricultural fields.Agricultural soils were characterized by organic slurry without much soil life. Soil nutrients were especially high for P, mostly in mineral form, and P-desorption rates were high. Partial and complete topsoil removal, aiming at heathland restoration, led to (much) lower soil organic matter and nutrients, but not to recovery of soil life, nor to P-limited soils. Heather was accompanied by many grassland species, even with complete topsoil removal. Conversion to rangeland did not decrease nutrient stocks, but led to improved soil life, although different from reference grasslands due to the higher pH. P-availability remained high, but net N-mineralization and plant N-content were clearly lower after 25 than after 18 years. Plant diversity was relatively high, and cover of eutrophic grasses decreased to 8–39% in intermediate and productive rangelands. Nutrient-poor species remained absent, but the slightly higher pH improved conditions for many grassland herbs. Afforestation did also not lead to nutrient-poor conditions, but soil life clearly increased and nutrients were used for rapid tree growth. Undergrowth species however remained eutrophic.It was impossible to retrieve the P-limited reference ecosystems within 25 years of restoration, not even with complete topsoil removal. Differences in plant diversity between expensive topsoil removal and much cheaper conversion to rangeland were also relatively small. For restoration on a landscape scale, it may thus be better to focus on conversion to semi-natural grasslands and afforestation. The half-open, nutrient-, mineral-, and species-rich landscape offers opportunities for large grazers, but also for many insects and birds.