کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
4389761 1618046 2013 10 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Riparian buffer located in an upland landscape position does not enhance nitrate-nitrogen removal
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علوم کشاورزی و بیولوژیک بوم شناسی، تکامل، رفتار و سامانه شناسی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Riparian buffer located in an upland landscape position does not enhance nitrate-nitrogen removal
چکیده انگلیسی

Relatively narrow (<50 m) riparian buffers strategically reestablished in correct landscape positions have been shown to significantly reduce agricultural non-point source pollution to streams. Because of this, conservation programs have been established to encourage landowners to enroll lands near surface waters to improve water quality. Former cropland enrolled in a conservation program was evaluated to determine its effectiveness in reducing nitrate-nitrogen (NO3−-N) in shallow groundwater. This conservation buffer (CB) was up to 80 m wide and was planted with loblolly pine (Pinus taeda). It was situated upslope of an existing 30–60 m wide riparian hardwood forest buffer (EHB) located within the floodplain of an intermittent stream. Shallow groundwater NO3−-N, groundwater hydrology, total organic carbon, and soil redox potential were measured throughout both the CB and the EHB for 18 months. Groundwater NO3−-N concentrations, often 5–15 mg L−1 within the CB, were not significantly reduced from concentrations that entered from the agricultural field edge. However, a decrease in NO3−-N concentration was observed within the EHB (17–83%). The hydrology of the CB coupled with relatively low organic carbon contributed to a low denitrification potential and lack of NO3−-N reduction compared with the EHB. While the CB enrollment likely provided additional habitat benefits it did not appear to provide treatment of groundwater NO3−-N. It is our conclusion that landscape position is a more important defining variable for buffer site selection than buffer width if NO3−-N reduction is a primary goal.


► The study emphasizes additional buffer width does not necessarily produce proportional groundwater water quality benefits.
► The conservation buffer was added in an upland landscape position and did not contribute to groundwater NO3−-N reduction.
► A reduction in NO3−-N was only observed through the existing hardwood forested buffer located downslope.
► Landscape position determined the effectiveness of this buffer and should be a primary metric for site selection.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Ecological Engineering - Volume 52, March 2013, Pages 252–261
نویسندگان
, , , , ,