کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
4395554 1618423 2014 9 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Contrasting perception of fish trophic level from stomach content and stable isotope analyses: A Mediterranean artificial reef experience
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
درک متقابل سطح تروفیک ماهی از محتوای معده و تجزیه و تحلیل ایزوتوپ پایدار: یک تجربه ریف مصنوعی مدیترانه ای
کلمات کلیدی
صخره های مصنوعی، رژیم غذایی ماهی، شمال غربی مدیترانه، ایزوتوپهای پایدار، محتوای معده، سطح تغذیه
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علوم کشاورزی و بیولوژیک علوم آبزیان
چکیده انگلیسی


• Fish diets were assessed on artificial reefs.
• Stomach content and stable isotope data are similar to those of natural environments.
• Artificial reefs provide diverse food sources for fishes, particularly crustaceans.
• Discrepancy may occur between δ15N and fish diet.
• Trophic level estimation should not be based on δ15N value alone.

A large complex of artificial reefs was deployed in the Bay of Marseilles, North-Western Mediterranean, for the enhancement of commercial fisheries stocks. Carbon and nitrogen stable isotope and stomach content analyses were performed on 23 fish species collected on the artificial reefs to assess their trophic position and feeding behaviour. Results indicated that fish diets were not modified on the artificial reefs compared to natural environments, nor was the structure of their trophic network. Artificial reefs, with their complex design, provide diverse and abundant food sources for fishes. Ranges of δ13C and δ15N of artificial reef fishes were comparable to those recorded in natural Mediterranean environments, with a similar trophic organization. However, some discrepancies appeared when comparing fish trophic level based on isotopic or diet results, which calls for a careful interpretation of stable isotope values as direct indicators of trophic level.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology - Volume 452, March 2014, Pages 54–62
نویسندگان
, , , ,