Comparative structural studies of psychrophilic and mesophilic protein homologues by molecular dynamics simulation

Comparative molecular dynamics simulations of psychrophilic type III antifreeze protein from the North-Atlantic ocean-pout Macrozoarces americanus and its corresponding mesophilic counterpart, the antifreeze-like domain of human sialic acid synthase, have been performed for 10 ns each at five different temperatures. Analyses of trajectories in terms of secondary structure content, solvent accessibility, intramolecular hydrogen bonds and protein–solvent interactions indicate distinct differences in these two proteins. The two proteins also follow dissimilar unfolding pathways. The overall flexibility calculated by the trace of the diagonalized covariance matrix displays similar flexibility of both the proteins near their growth temperatures. However at higher temperatures psychrophilic protein shows increased overall flexibility than its mesophilic counterpart. Principal component analysis also indicates that the essential subspaces explored by the simulations of two proteins at different temperatures are non-overlapping and they show significantly different directions of motion. However, there are significant overlaps within the trajectories and similar directions of motion of each protein especially at 298 K, 310 K and 373 K. Overall, the psychrophilic protein leads to increased conformational sampling of the phase space than its mesophilic counterpart.Our study may help in elucidating the molecular basis of thermostability of homologous proteins from two organisms living at different temperature conditions. Such an understanding is required for designing efficient proteins with characteristics for a particular application at desired working temperatures.