Resource allocation as a driver of senescence: Life history tradeoffs produce age patterns of mortality

• Age-related tradeoffs partition lives into up to four behavior and mortality phases.
• Given a cost of reproduction, terminal investment may drive actuarial senescence.
• Those starting more resources need not eat before reproducing and thus starve sooner.
• Low costs of reproduction encourage capital breeding and early terminal investment.
• Physiological, behavioral and resource tradeoffs have strong effects on optimal mortality.

We investigate the effects of optimal time and resource allocation on age patterns of fertility and mortality for a model organism with (1) fixed maximum lifespan, (2) distinct juvenile and adult diets, and (3) reliance on nonrenewable resources for reproduction. We ask when it is optimal to tolerate starvation vs. conserve resources and then examine the effects of these decisions on adult mortality rates. We find that (1) age-related changes in tradeoffs partition the life cycle into as many as four discrete phases with different optimal behavior and mortality patterns, and (2) given a cost of reproduction, terminal investment can produce a signal of actuarial senescence. Also, given limitations imposed by non-replenishable resources, individuals beginning adult life with more replenishable resources do not necessarily live longer, since they can engage in capital breeding and need not defer reproduction to forage; low reproductive overheads and low costs of starvation also encourage capital breeding and may lead to earlier terminal investment and earlier senescence. We conclude that, even for species with qualitatively similar life histories, differences in physiological, behavioral and environmental tradeoffs or constraints may strongly influence optimal allocation schedules and produce variation in mortality patterns and life expectancy.