Habitat effects on second-order predation of the seed predator Harpalus rufipes and implications for weed seedbank management

• Assays were used to quantify second-order predation of weed seed predator Harpalus rufipes.
• Motion-sensing wildlife cameras were used to capture images of second-order predators.
• Second-order predation was greater in complex habitats than simple.
• A simulation model predicts second-order predation substantially increases seedbank inputs.

Seed predators provide a valuable ecosystem service to farmers by reducing densities of weed seeds, and, in turn, densities of weed seedlings they must manage. The predominant invertebrate weed seed predator in Maine, USA, agroecosystems is the carabid beetle Harpalus rufipes DeGeer. Pitfall trapping has shown that H. rufipes prefers sites with vegetative cover to fallow sites, preference speculated to be driven by predator avoidance behavior. To test this hypothesis, ‘second-order predation assays’ were developed, in which live H. rufipes prey were presented to second-order predators. Field experiments were conducted to determine foremost if H. rufipes was subject to second-order predation, and secondly, whether (a) vegetative cover affords H. rufipes protection from second-order predators, and (b) high rates of second-order predation correspond with decreased invertebrate seed predation rates. Two 72-h experiments were conducted (mid August and September 2012) at crop and non-crop sites across a 28 ha diversified farm in Stillwater, ME, USA.Second-order predation was 2.8% per day. Based on images from motion-sensing cameras, H. rufipes’ predators included birds and small mammals. Neither a relationship between second-order predation and vegetative treatment, nor an empirical relationship between second-order predation and invertebrate seed predation were detected. However, a simulation model predicted that 2.8% per day second-order predation could increase the number of seeds entering the seedbank by more than 17% annually. Additionally, complex habitats supported higher rates of second-order predation than did simple habitats.

Figure optionsDownload as PowerPoint slide