On the compact-open and admissible topologies

It is known (see, for example, [H. Render, Nonstandard topology on function spaces with applications to hyperspaces, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 336 (1) (1993) 101–119; M. Escardo, J. Lawson, A. Simpson, Comparing cartesian closed categories of (core) compactly generated spaces, Topology Appl. 143 (2004) 105–145; D.N. Georgiou, S.D. Iliadis, F. Mynard, Function space topologies, in: Open Problems in Topology 2, Elsevier, 2007, pp. 15–23]) that the intersection of all admissible topologies on the set C(Y,Z) of all continuous maps of an arbitrary space Y into an arbitrary space Z, is always the greatest splitting topology (which in general is not admissible). The following, interesting in our opinion, problem is arised: when a given splitting topology (for example, the compact-open topology, the Isbell topology, and the greatest splitting topology) is the intersection of k admissible topologies, where k is a finite number. Of course, in this case this splitting topology will be the greatest splitting.In the case, where a given splitting topology is admissible the above number k is equal to one. For example, if Y is a locally compact Hausdorff space, then k=1 for the compact-open topology (see [R.H. Fox, On topologies for function spaces, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 51 (1945) 429–432; R. Arens, A topology for spaces of transformations, Ann. of Math. 47 (1946) 480–495; R. Arens, J. Dugundji, Topologies for function spaces, Pacific J. Math. 1 (1951) 5–31]). Also, if Y is a corecompact space, then k=1 for the Isbell topology (see [P. Lambrinos, B.K. Papadopoulos, The (strong) Isbell topology and (weakly) continuous lattices, in: Continuous Lattices and Applications, in: Lect. Notes Pure Appl. Math., vol. 101, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1984, pp. 191–211; F. Schwarz, S. Weck, Scott topology, Isbell topology, and continuous convergence, in: Lect. Notes Pure Appl. Math., vol. 101, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1984, pp. 251–271]).In [R. Arens, J. Dugundji, Topologies for function spaces, Pacific J. Math. 1 (1951) 5–31] a non-locally compact completely regular space Y is constructed such that the compact-open topology on C(Y,S), where S is the Sierpinski space, coincides with the greatest splitting topology (which is not admissible). This fact is proved by the construction of two admissible topologies on C(Y,S) whose intersection is the compact-open topology, that is k=2.In the present paper improving the method of [R. Arens, J. Dugundji, Topologies for function spaces, Pacific J. Math. 1 (1951) 5–31] we construct some other non-locally compact spaces Y such that the compact-open topology on C(Y,S) is the intersection of two admissible topologies. Also, we give some concrete problems concerning the above arised general problem.