کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
4928094 | 1432013 | 2017 | 9 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Multicriteria evaluation of sustainable energy solutions for Colosseum
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
ارزیابی چند متغیری از راه حل های انرژی پایدار برای کولوسئوم
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
کلمات کلیدی
برنامه ریزی انرژی پایدار، بهره وری انرژی، سیستم های گرمایشی ساختمان ها، تجزیه و تحلیل تصمیمات چندگانه تجزیه و تحلیل پذیری چند ضلعی تصریح پذیر،
Sustainable energy planning - برنامه ریزی انرژی پایدارEnergy efficiency - بهره وری انرژیmulticriteria decision analysis - تجزیه و تحلیل تصمیم گیری چند متغیریStochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis - تجزیه و تحلیل پذیری چند متغیره تصادفیBuildings - ساختمان هاheating systems - سیستم های گرمایشی
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه
مهندسی انرژی
انرژی های تجدید پذیر، توسعه پایدار و محیط زیست
چکیده انگلیسی
Colosseum is a large office building in the capital region of Finland. The building owner operates on the highly competitive office rental market. With increasing emphasis on environmental responsibility, energy efficiency and sustainable energy solutions can provide competitive edge on the rental market. This study evaluates in terms of multiple criteria different alternatives to enhance the energy solutions of the building. The alternatives included different configurations of solar power, ground source heat, and roof constructions, along with district heating. Decision criteria included internal rate of return, energy efficiency, CO2 emissions, and attractiveness. Attractiveness was evaluated by a set of experts in office building valuation. The alternatives were compared using Stochastic Multicriteria Acceptability Analysis (SMAA), which is a simulation based method for decision problems where different kinds of uncertain information are represented by probability distributions. As novelty, the pairwise winning indices were used to form a stochastic ranking of alternatives. Analyses were conducted both without and with decision maker's preference information. Most preferred alternatives were based on ground source heat. However, these alternatives require extensive renovation to install a hydronic central heating system. If such renovation is considered infeasible, then solar power alternatives become most preferred.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Sustainable Cities and Society - Volume 35, November 2017, Pages 289-297
Journal: Sustainable Cities and Society - Volume 35, November 2017, Pages 289-297
نویسندگان
Oskari Loikkanen, Risto Lahdelma, Pekka Salminen,