Robust hashing for multi-view data: Jointly learning low-rank kernelized similarity consensus and hash functions*

- A robust hashing method for multi-view data with noise corruptions is presented.
- It is to jointly learn a low-rank kernelized similarity consensus and hash functions.
- Approximate landmark graph is employed to make training fast.
- Extensive experiments are conducted on benchmarks to show the efficacy of our model.

Learning hash functions/codes for similarity search over multi-view data is attracting increasing attention, where similar hash codes are assigned to the data objects characterizing consistently neighborhood relationship across views. Traditional methods in this category inherently suffer three limitations: 1) they commonly adopt a two-stage scheme where similarity matrix is first constructed, followed by a subsequent hash function learning; 2) these methods are commonly developed on the assumption that data samples with multiple representations are noise-free,which is not practical in real-life applications; and 3) they often incur cumbersome training model caused by the neighborhood graph construction using all N points in the database (O(N)). In this paper, we motivate the problem of jointly and efficiently training the robust hash functions over data objects with multi-feature representations which may be noise corrupted. To achieve both the robustness and training efficiency, we propose an approach to effectively and efficiently learning low-rank kernelized1 hash functions shared across views. Specifically, we utilize landmark graphs to construct tractable similarity matrices in multi-views to automatically discover neighborhood structure in the data. To learn robust hash functions, a latent low-rank kernel function is used to construct hash functions in order to accommodate linearly inseparable data. In particular, a latent kernelized similarity matrix is recovered by rank minimization on multiple kernel-based similarity matrices. Extensive experiments on real-world multi-view datasets validate the efficacy of our method in the presence of error corruptions.We use kernelized similarity rather than kernel, as it is not a squared symmetric matrix for data-landmark affinity matrix.