Scanning to conclusions? Visual attention to neutral faces under stress in individuals with and without subclinical paranoia.

- We explored visual attention to neutral faces in subjects with varying delusion-proneness.
- Results partially support a more restricted scanpath in subclinical paranoia.
- The scanpath abnormality was characterized by a spatial restriction.
- Restricted scanpaths may be an early-detectable vulnerability indicator of psychosis.
- Restricted scanpaths were unrelated to trustworthiness rating of faces.

Background and objectivesA promising candidate for a vulnerability indicator for psychosis is the restricted scanpath. Restricted scanning of social stimuli, such as faces, might also contribute to misinterpretations of facial expressions and thus increase the likelihood of delusional interpretations. Moreover, similar to other vulnerability indicators of psychosis, scanpaths may be susceptible to stress. Thus, we hypothesized that scanpath restriction would increase as a function of delusion-proneness, stress and their interaction.MethodsParticipants were asked to look at neutral faces and rate their trustworthiness under a stress and a non-stress condition, while the eye gaze was recorded. The non-clinical sample was classified into low- and high-paranoia scorers using a median split. Eye-tracking parameters of interest were number of fixations, fixations within emotion-relevant facial areas, scanpath length and duration of fixations.ResultsIn general, high-paranoia scorers had a significantly shorter scanpath compared to low-paranoia scorers (F(1, 48) = 2.831, p = 0.05, ηp2 = 0.056) and there was a trend towards a further decrease of scanpath length under stress in high-paranoia scorers relative to low-paranoia scorers (interaction effect: F(1, 48) = 2.638, p = 0.056, ηp2 = 0.052). However, no effects were found for the other eye-tracking parameters. Moreover, trustworthiness ratings remained unaffected by group or condition.LimitationsThe participants of this study had only slight elevations of delusion-proneness, which might explain the absence of differences in trustworthiness ratings.ConclusionsRestricted scanpaths appear to be partly present in individuals with subclinical levels of paranoia and appear to be susceptible to stress in this group. Nevertheless, further research in high-risk groups is necessary before drawing more definite conclusions.