کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5045939 1475897 2017 7 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
The assessment of fatigue: Psychometric qualities and norms for the Checklist individual strength
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
ارزیابی خستگی: کیفیت روان سنجی و هنجارهای قدرت فردی چک لیست
کلمات کلیدی
نتایج گزارش شده توسط بیمار، پرسشنامه خستگی، قابلیت اطمینان و اعتبار، روان سنجی، خستگی مزمن، فهرست قدرت فردی،
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علم عصب شناسی روانپزشکی بیولوژیکی
چکیده انگلیسی


- The Checklist Individual Strength (CIS), an instrument used to assess fatigue, is a reliable and valid measure of fatigue.
- Cut-off scores for severe fatigue are presented that can be used in clinical practice and research.
- Norms of CIS scores for the general population and eight different medical condition are presented.

ObjectiveThe Checklist Individual Strength (CIS) measures four dimensions of fatigue: Fatigue severity, concentration problems, reduced motivation and activity. On the fatigue severity subscale, a cut-off score of 35 is used. This study 1) investigated the psychometric qualities of the CIS; 2) validated the cut-off score for severe fatigue and 3) provided norms.MethodsRepresentatives of the Dutch general population (n = 2288) completed the CIS. The factor structure was investigated using an exploratory factor analysis. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were determined. Concurrent validity was assessed in two additional samples by correlating the CIS with other fatigue scales (Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire, MOS Short form-36 Vitality subscale, EORTC QLQ-C30 fatigue subscale).To validate the fatigue severity cut-off score, a Receiver Operating Characteristics analysis was performed with patients referred to a chronic fatigue treatment centre (n = 5243) and a healthy group (n = 1906). Norm scores for CIS subscales were calculated for the general population, patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS; n = 1407) and eight groups with other medical conditions (n = 1411).ResultsThe original four-factor structure of the CIS was replicated. Internal consistency (α = 0.84-0.95) and test-retest reliability (r = 0.74-0.86) of the subscales were high. Correlations with other fatigue scales were moderate to high. The 35 points cut-off score for severe fatigue is appropriate, but, given the 17% false positive rate, should be adjusted to 40 for research in CFS.ConclusionThe CIS is a valid and reliable tool for the assessment of fatigue, with a validated cut-off score for severe fatigue that can be used in clinical practice.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of Psychosomatic Research - Volume 98, July 2017, Pages 40-46
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , , ,