کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
5045962 | 1475901 | 2017 | 8 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
- Chronic exposure to ERI was associated with high psychological distress.
- The deleterious health effects of ERI were found among men and women.
- A lack of adaptation to chronic ERI over time was observed.
- Repeated ERI exposure led to greater prevalence than single baseline exposure.
ObjectivesProspective studies which evaluated whether the effects of chronic exposure to psychosocial work factors on mental health persisted over time are scarce. For the first time, this study evaluated: 1) the effect of chronic exposure to effort-reward imbalance over 5Â years on the prevalence of high psychological distress among men and women, and 2) the persistence of this effect over time.MethodsOverall, 1747 white-collar workers from three public organizations participated in a prospective study. Psychological distress and effort-reward imbalance were measured using validated questionnaires at baseline, and at 3- and 5-year follow-ups. Prevalence ratios (PRs) of high psychological distress were estimated using log-binomial regression according to baseline and repeated exposure.ResultsCompared to unexposed workers, those with repeated exposure to effort-reward imbalance had a higher prevalence of high psychological distress. Workers exposed only at some time-points also had a higher prevalence. The deleterious effect of repeated exposure observed at the 3-year follow-up persisted at the 5-year follow-up among women (PRÂ =Â 2.48 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.97-3.11) and men (PRÂ =Â 1.91 95% CI 1.20-3.04). These effects were greater than those found using a single baseline measurement.ConclusionThe current study supported a deleterious effect of repeated exposure to effort-reward imbalance on psychological distress, and a lack of adaptation to these effects over time among men and women. Since psychological distress may later lead to severe mental problems, current results highlight the need to consider exposure to these adverse work factors in primary and secondary preventions aimed at reducing mental health problems at work.
Journal: Journal of Psychosomatic Research - Volume 94, March 2017, Pages 56-63