کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5049787 1476384 2013 10 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Explaining the appearance and success of open space referenda
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
توضیح ظاهر و موفقیت های رفراندوم فضای باز
کلمات کلیدی
اقتصاد سنجی فضایی، تجزیه و تحلیل بقا، فضای باز، رفراندوم،
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علوم کشاورزی و بیولوژیک بوم شناسی، تکامل، رفتار و سامانه شناسی
چکیده انگلیسی


- Examines the appearance and success of voter referenda for open space preservation
- First study to control for spatial dependence/spatial autocorrelation in this context
- Uses hazard models to examine the timing of referenda appearance

Many communities in the United States have begun enacting policies to preserve open space, often through local voter referenda. New Jersey sponsors such municipal action through the Green Acres Program by providing funding and low interest loans to towns that choose to increase property taxes and spend the money raised on open space preservation for the purposes of conservation and/or recreation. This paper endeavors to understand which factors contribute to the appearance and success of these measures. Although previous literature has examined this issue, this is the first study to account for spatial dependence/spatial autocorrelation and to explore dynamic issues through survival analysis. The traditional two stage model from the literature is extended by incorporating a Bayesian spatial probit for the first stage and a maximum-likelihood spatial error model in the second stage. A Cox-proportional hazard model is used to examine the timing of referenda appearance. Spatial dependence is found in the second stage of the analysis, indicating that future studies should account for its influence. There is no strong evidence for spatial dependence or correlation in the first stage. The survival model is found to be a useful complement to the traditional probit analysis of the first stage.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Ecological Economics - Volume 95, November 2013, Pages 108-117
نویسندگان
, , ,