کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5063690 1476700 2017 11 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Spatial statistical methods applied to the 2015 Brazilian energy distribution benchmarking model: Accounting for unobserved determinants of inefficiencies
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
روش های آماری فضایی برای مدل برآورد توزیع انرژی برزیل در سال 2015: حسابداری برای تعیین کننده های نامطلوب ناکارآمدی
کلمات کلیدی
تحلیل پوششی داده ها، تجزیه و تحلیل مرحله دوم، آمار فضایی، تجزیه و تحلیل بیزی،
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه مهندسی انرژی انرژی (عمومی)
چکیده انگلیسی


- Statistical analysis between DEA efficiency scores and environmental variables is proposed.
- Spatial statistic methods are applied to the first stage efficiency scores.
- Second stage model accounting for a spatial latent structure is presented.
- Results show major differences between original and corrected efficiency scores.

In 2015 the Brazilian regulator presented a DEA benchmarking model to set the regulatory operational cost goals, to be reached in four years for 61 electricity distribution utilities. The DEA model uses: adjusted operational cost as the input variable, seven output variables and weight restrictions. Although non-discretionary variables or environmental variables are available in the dataset, the regulator argued that no statistically significant correlation was found between the DEA efficiency scores and the non-discretionary variables. This study evaluates the statistical correlation between the DEA efficiency scores and the available environmental variables. Spatial statistic methods are used to show that the efficiency scores are geographically correlated. Furthermore, due to Brazil's environmental diversity and large territory it is unlikely that only one environmental component is sufficient to adjust inefficiencies across the Brazilian territory. Thus, a new combined environmental variable is proposed. Finally, a second stage model using the proposed environmental variable and accounting for a spatial latent structure is presented. Results show major differences between original and corrected efficiency scores, mainly for utilities located in harsh environments and which originally achieved lower efficiency scores.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Energy Economics - Volume 64, May 2017, Pages 373-383
نویسندگان
, , , ,