When does methadone treatment reduce arrest and severity of arrest charges? An analysis of arrest records

- We investigated the arrest history of 289 newly-admitted methadone treatment patients.
- The majority had no arrests in the year before and after treatment entry.
- Of those arrested, the majority were charged with non-severe crimes.
- There were no significant differences in likelihood of arrest in year before vs. after methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) entry.
- There were also no significant differences in charge severity between those time periods.

This is an analysis of the odds of arrest, severity of charges, and factors predicting these outcomes in the year after methadone treatment entry using arrest records of patients (N = 289) participating in two opioid treatment programs (OTPs) in Baltimore, MD as part of a previously-reported study. Baseline Addiction Severity Index data were examined along with publicly-available dates of arrest and arrest charges from the year before and after OTP entry. Severity of charges was rated independently by three researchers using a 1-7 point scale. Data were analyzed using Generalized Estimating Equations and Multiple Regression. The majority of the patients had no arrests over both time periods (61.6% and 65.7%, respectively). Of those arrested, the majority of the sample were charged with non-severe crimes in the year before and after OTP entry (82.9% and 73.7%, respectively). There were no significant differences in the odds of arrest or severity of charges in the year before versus the year after OTP admission (both ps > 0.05). Predictors of arrest following admission included an arrest in the year prior to admission (p < 0.001), younger age (p < 0.001), and more lifetime months of incarceration (p = 0.045). Predictors of the higher severity of charges included younger age (p < 0.001), African-American race (p = 0.032), and more lifetime months of incarceration (p = 0.018). While in this population, the odds of arrest and severity of charges did not decrease significantly in the year following OTP entry, we discuss the need to avoid generalizing findings without considering those factors that may influence the likelihood of post-OTP entry arrest.