Laboratory analysis of risky driving at 0.05% and 0.08% blood alcohol concentration

- Analysis of risky driving behaviors at 0.05% versus 0.08% blood alcohol concentration (BAC) in a driving simulator.
- Risk-taking at 0.05% was significantly lower than risk-taking at 0.08%.
- Reducing the legal driving limit from 0.08% to 0.05% could reduce risky driving.

BackgroundThe public health costs associated with alcohol-related traffic crashes are a continuing problem for society. One harm reduction strategy has been to employ per se limits for blood alcohol concentrations (BACs) at which drivers can legally operate motor vehicles. This limit is currently 0.08% in all 50 US states. Recently, the National Transportation Safety Board proposed lowering the legal limit to 0.05% (NTSB, 2013). While research has well-validated the ability of alcohol to impair driving performance and heighten crash-risk at these BACs, relatively little is known about the degree to which alcohol might increase drivers' risk-taking.MethodsRisk-taking was examined in 20 healthy adults who were each tested in a driving simulator following placebo and two doses of alcohol calculated to yield peak BACs of 0.08% and 0.05%, the respective current and proposed BAC limits. The drive test emphasized risk-taking by placing participants in a multiple-lane, high-traffic environment. The primary measure was how close drivers maneuvered relative to other vehicles on the road (i.e., time-to-collision, TTC).ResultsAlcohol increased risk-taking by decreasing drivers' TTC at the 0.08% target BAC relative to placebo. Moreover, risk-taking at the 0.05% target was less than risk-taking at 0.08% target BAC.ConclusionsThese findings provide evidence that reducing the legal BAC limit in the USA to 0.05% would decrease risk-taking among drivers. A clearer understanding of the dose-response relationship between various aspects of driving behaviors, such as drivers' accepted level of risk while driving, is an important step to improving traffic safety.