کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
5120199 | 1486120 | 2017 | 6 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
- We attempted to create a clinically meaningful alcohol use cutoff.
- We conducted secondary data analyses using Project MATCH and COMBINE data.
- The results fail to provide support for a clinically meaningful alcohol use cutoff.
- Across a range of consequences, no cutoff resulted in high sensitivity/specificity.
- No specific level of alcohol use is a good proxy for alcohol consequences.
BackgroundTo examine whether a clinically meaningful alcohol consumption cutoff can be created for clinical samples, we used receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves to derive gender-specific consumption cutoffs that maximized sensitivity and specificity in the prediction of a wide range of negative consequences from drinking.MethodsWe conducted secondary data analyses using data from two large clinical trials targeting alcohol use disorders: Project MATCH (n = 1726) and COMBINE (n = 1383).ResultsIn both studies, we found that the ideal cutoff for men and women that maximized sensitivity/specificity varied substantially both across different alcohol consumption variables and alcohol consequence outcomes. Further, the levels of sensitivity/specificity were poor across all consequences.ConclusionsThese results fail to provide support for a clinically meaningful alcohol consumption cutoff and suggest that binary classification of levels of alcohol consumption is a poor proxy for maximizing sensitivity/specificity in the prediction of negative consequences from drinking. Future research examining consumption-consequence associations should take advantage of continuous measures of alcohol consumption and alternative approaches for assessing the link between levels of consumption and consequences (e.g., ecological momentary assessment). Clinical researchers should consider focusing more directly on the consequences they aim to reduce instead of relying on consumption as a proxy for more clinically meaningful outcomes.
Journal: Drug and Alcohol Dependence - Volume 171, 1 February 2017, Pages 91-96