کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
5120422 | 1486122 | 2016 | 6 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

- A previously highly successful RBS intervention to reduce violence had no effect in a new setting.
- The study also uncovered the challenges in establishing adequate control areas in such research.
- More knowledge is still needed regarding mechanisms at work and in which contexts such interventions will succeed.
BackgroundThe Stockholm Prevents Alcohol and Drug Problems (STAD) programme has been regarded as one of the most successful programmes to date, in reducing alcohol-related violence. This multi-component Responsible Beverage Service (RBS) programme was implemented in Stockholm, Sweden, and has been documented to be extremely effective in reducing alcohol-related nightlife violence. The SALUTT programme in Oslo, Norway was carefully modelled on the STAD project.AimWe investigate whether the results from STAD were replicated in the SALUTT intervention.DesignUsing geocoded data, the level of violence in the intervention area was compared with different control areas before and after the intervention.StatisticsAutoregressive moving average models (ARIMA).FindingsThe SALUTT programme had no statistically significant effect on violence. However, the level of violence in the different potential control areas of Oslo fluctuated without a clear common trend. Hence, it was difficult to establish proper control areas.ConclusionsThe results from the Swedish STAD-intervention were not replicated in Oslo. Successful interventions are not necessarily replicated in other contexts, and the current literature does not shed sufficient light on the conditions under which such interventions actually work. Moreover, more attention should be devoted to the identification of adequate control areas in future research.
155
Journal: Drug and Alcohol Dependence - Volume 169, 1 December 2016, Pages 128-133