کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5526178 1547048 2017 8 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Clinical TrialRandomised, open-label, phase II study comparing the efficacy and the safety of cabazitaxel versus weekly paclitaxel given as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with operable triple-negative or luminal B/HER2-negative breast cancer (GENEVIEVE
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری بیوشیمی، ژنتیک و زیست شناسی مولکولی تحقیقات سرطان
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Clinical TrialRandomised, open-label, phase II study comparing the efficacy and the safety of cabazitaxel versus weekly paclitaxel given as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with operable triple-negative or luminal B/HER2-negative breast cancer (GENEVIEVE
چکیده انگلیسی


- No short-term effect of cabazitaxel was detected compared to paclitaxel as neoadjuvant treatment for breast cancer.
- No differences in drug exposure and patient compliance were observed between the two arms.
- The rate of haematological toxicities was significantly higher in patients receiving cabazitaxel compared to paclitaxel.

BackgroundThe GENEVIEVE study compared the pathological complete response (pCR) rate (ypT0/is ypN0/+) in patients with operable human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer (BC) treated with either cabazitaxel or paclitaxel.MethodsGENEVIEVE was a prospective, multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase II study comparing the efficacy and the safety of four 3-weekly cycles cabazitaxel versus 12 weeks of paclitaxel given as neoadjuvant treatment. Primary end-point was the pCR rate defined as the complete absence of invasive carcinoma on histological examination of the breast irrespective of lymph node involvement (ypT0/is, ypN0/+) after the taxane treatment. Patients could receive an anthracycline-based therapy thereafter.ResultsOverall, 333 patients were randomised and started treatment with 74.7% and 83.2% of patients completing treatment in the cabazitaxel and paclitaxel arms, respectively. Patients in cabazitaxel arm had a significantly lower pCR rate compared to the paclitaxel arm (1.2% versus 10.8%; p = 0.001). A total of 42 (25.3%) patients in the cabazitaxel arm and 17 (10.2%) in the paclitaxel arm had at least one serious adverse event (p < 0.001). Dose reductions were observed in 9.6% patients in the cabazitaxel arm compared to 11.4% in the paclitaxel arm (p = 0.721). Main reason for dose reductions was non-haematological toxicities in 3.0% versus 7.8% (p = 0.087), respectively.ConclusionsThe GENEVIEVE study showed no short-term effect of cabazitaxel in triple-negative or luminal B/HER2-negative primary BC, while there seemed to be no differences in drug exposure and patient compliance between the two arms.Clinical trials registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01779479.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: European Journal of Cancer - Volume 84, October 2017, Pages 1-8
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,