کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5526316 1547060 2017 8 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Original ResearchQuality of life and swallowing with standard chemoradiotherapy versus accelerated radiotherapy and panitumumab in locoregionally advanced carcinoma of the head and neck: A phase III randomised trial from the Canadian Cancer Trials Group (
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری بیوشیمی، ژنتیک و زیست شناسی مولکولی تحقیقات سرطان
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Original ResearchQuality of life and swallowing with standard chemoradiotherapy versus accelerated radiotherapy and panitumumab in locoregionally advanced carcinoma of the head and neck: A phase III randomised trial from the Canadian Cancer Trials Group (
چکیده انگلیسی


- Three hundred twenty head and neck cancer patients participated in a phase III randomised trial comparing standard radiotherapy /cisplatin with accelerated radiotherapy/panitumumab.
- Quality of life (QOL) and swallowing outcomes were compared between arms.
- No clinically important differences by arm were seen 2-36 months post-treatment.
- Swallowing and head and neck-specific QOL showed persistent declines in both study arms.
- These results do not suggest adopting the experimental arm to improve QOL.

AimTo compare quality of life (QOL) between standard (SFX) chemoradiotherapy (arm A) and altered fractionation radiotherapy (AFX) with panitumumab (PMab; arm B).MethodsPatients with T any N + M0 or T3-4N0M0 squamous cell head-neck carcinoma were randomised to SFX (70 Gy/35/7 wks) plus cisplatin (100 mg/m2 IV × 3) versus AFX (70 Gy/35/6 wks) plus PMab (9 mg/kg IV × 3). QOL was collected at baseline, end of radiation therapy (RT) and 2, 4, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months post-RT using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Head and Neck (FACT-H&N), MD Anderson Dysphagia Index (MDADI) and SWAL-QOL. We hypothesised a 6-point more favourable change in FACT-H&N score from baseline to 1 year in arm B over arm A.ResultsAmong 320 patients, median follow-up was 46 (range: 0.1-64.3) months, median age 56, 84% male, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS 0 (71%), 1 (29%). Primary site was oropharynx in 81% (p16+ 68%, p16− 16%, missing 16%). Baseline scores did not differ by arm (A/B): FACT-H&N 116.5/115, MDADI Global 83/77, SWAL-QOL General 67/68. At 1 year, no difference was seen between arms in FACT-H&N change from baseline: A −1.70, B −4.81, p = 0.194. Subscale change scores by arm were (A/B): last week RT, FACT-Physical (−11.6, −10, p = 0.049), MDADI Physical (−40.4, −33.9, p = 0.045), and SWAL-QOL Eating Duration (−61.2, −51.2, p = 0.02), Eating Desire (−53.3, −43.9, p = 0.031) and Mental Health (−42, −32.6, p = 0.009); 4 months, HN subscale (−7.7, −10, p = 0.014). No clinically important differences by arm were seen post-treatment.ConclusionsPMab with AFX did not durably improve QOL or swallowing as compared with SFX with cisplatin.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00820248.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: European Journal of Cancer - Volume 72, February 2017, Pages 192-199
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,