کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
5605571 | 1576120 | 2017 | 4 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Feasibility of low radiation dose retrospectively-gated cardiac CT for functional analysis in adult congenital heart disease Feasibility of low radiation dose retrospectively-gated cardiac CT for functional analysis in adult congenital heart disease](/preview/png/5605571.png)
BackgroundThe use of cardiac computed tomography (CT) in the evaluation of adult congenital heart disease patients is limited due to concerns of high radiation doses. The purpose of this study was to prospectively assess whether low radiation dose cardiac CT is feasible to evaluate ventricular systolic function in adults with congenital heart disease.MethodsThe study group included 30 consecutive patients with significant congenital heart disease who underwent a total of 35 ECG-gated cardiac CT scans utilizing a 320-detector row CT scanner. Each study included a non-contrast scan and subsequent contrast-enhanced retrospectively-gated acquisition. Effective radiation dose was estimated by multiplying the dose length product by a k-factor of 0.014 mSv/mGy cm.ResultsThe mean age of the patients was 34.4 ± 8.9 years, 60% were men, and mean body mass index was 24.2 ± 4.3 kg/m2. A majority of patients (n = 28, 93.3%) had contraindications to cardiac MRI. A tube potential of 80 kV was used in 27 (77.1%) of the contrast-enhanced scans. The mean signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios were 11.5 ± 3.9 and 10.3 ± 3.7, respectively. The median radiation dose for non-contrast and contrast-enhanced images were 0.1 mSv (0.07-0.2 mSv) and 0.94 mSv (0.5-2.1 mSv), respectively. All 35 CT scans were successfully analyzed for ventricular systolic function.ConclusionsA low radiation contrast-enhanced, retrospectively-gated cardiac CT with a median radiation dose of less than 1 mSv was successful in evaluating ventricular systolic function in 30 consecutive adult congenital heart disease patients who underwent a total of 35 scans.
Journal: International Journal of Cardiology - Volume 228, 1 February 2017, Pages 180-183